Case 1600299/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Phillis v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600299/2024
- Decision date
- 3 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Phillis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the Claimant did not pursue the claim for Automatic Unfair Dismissal and wished to withdraw it. Employment Judge G Duncan dismissed that claim.
The tribunal found that Tesco Stores Limited unfairly dismissed the Claimant, and the claim for unfair dismissal succeeded. The judgment does not set out the reasoning for that conclusion.
No remedy was awarded in this judgment. The parties were directed to try to agree an award, with provision for a remedy hearing if agreement was not reached by 30 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the Claimant did not pursue and wished to withdraw the claim for Automatic Unfair Dismissal; the tribunal dismissed that claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the Respondent unfairly dismissed the Claimant and that the claim for unfair dismissal succeeds. Remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.