Case 1600300/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr MD Singh v Echo Security Limited and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600300/2022
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr MD Singh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing held via Cloud Video Platform in Glasgow on 17 November 2022, Employment Judge M Sangster gave oral reasons and issued the judgment for case numbers 1600300/2022, 4101511/2022 and 4101510/2022. The written judgment records that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the claimants' complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract.
Those complaints were therefore dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any separate remedy assessment, and it does not set out any further substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimants' complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimants' complaints of breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.