Case 1600302/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs M Becher v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs Heard: by video — 2021

Case reference: 1600302/2021
Decision date: 12 October 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs M Becher

Respondent

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs Heard: by video

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard by video on 11 October 2021 before Employment Judge S Jenkins, with Mrs M Becher appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant's claims were not brought within the period of three months beginning with the date of termination of her employment.

The tribunal also found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claims to have been brought within that three-month period. On that basis, the claims were dismissed and no monetary award was made.

Claims and outcomes

6 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Age discrimination	Dismissed because the tribunal found the claim was not brought within the three-month period beginning with the date of termination and that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time.	Dismissed	Age	—
Breach of contract	Dismissed because the tribunal found the claim was not brought within the three-month period beginning with the date of termination and that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time.	Dismissed	—	—
Disability discrimination	Dismissed because the tribunal found the claim was not brought within the three-month period beginning with the date of termination and that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Redundancy	Dismissed because the tribunal found the claim was not brought within the three-month period beginning with the date of termination and that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time.	Dismissed	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed because the tribunal found the claim was not brought within the three-month period beginning with the date of termination and that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.