Case 1600303/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Beynon v The Llynfi Arms Limited Date: 7 May 2020 — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600303/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Beynon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent. The employment judge recorded that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to enable a proper determination to be made on the papers.
The tribunal upheld two claims: unpaid holiday pay and unpaid notice pay. It awarded £765 gross in respect of unpaid holiday pay and £425 gross in respect of unpaid notice pay.
The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The total of the awards is £1,190 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment upheld unpaid holiday pay (gross) of £765. | Upheld | — | £765 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment upheld unpaid notice pay (gross) of £425. | Upheld | — | £425 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,190
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.