Case 1600310/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Zivnustkova v Specialist Cars Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600310/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal case was Miss V Zivnustkova v Specialist Cars Ltd. By a letter dated 6 June 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment records that the respondent failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claims. The judgment does not identify the substantive claims more specifically, and it does not record any remedy or monetary award. It also states that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s) beyond referring to 'the claims'; the claims were struck out because the Tribunal considered they had no reasonable prospect of success and the respondent did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.