Case 1600313/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Lawrence v South Wales Plumbing and Heating Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600313/2019
- Decision date
- 24 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Lawrence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Davies dealt with the claim on 17 May 2019 in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent, South Wales Plumbing and Heating Ltd. The judgment records that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unpaid wages claim and awarded £2,006.00 gross. The judgment does not set out any contested findings of fact beyond the absence of a response and the tribunal's conclusion that the claim could be determined on the papers.
The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay, although only unpaid wages were expressly upheld in the extract provided. The judgment was sent to the parties on 24 May 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment upholds unpaid wages in the sum of £2,006.00 gross. It states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the award. | Upheld | — | £2,006 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,006
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.