Case 1600316/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G McCarthy v Ron Skinner and Sons Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600316/2023
- Decision date
- 4 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G McCarthy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 13 September 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr G McCarthy an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claim had not been actively pursued and that there had been failure to comply with Case Management Orders.
Mr McCarthy did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Sharp therefore struck out the claim on 22 September 2023. The judgment was sent to the parties on 4 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By letter dated 13 September 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and because of failure to comply with Case Management Orders. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing, so the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.