Case 1600319/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Cairns v Milkwood Care Ltd t/a Ganarew House — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600319/2022
- Decision date
- 22 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
- Panel members
- Mr P Charles, Mr D G Howells
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Cairns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Cairns brought claims of unfair dismissal and victimisation against Milkwood Care Ltd t/a Ganarew House. The Tribunal found that she resigned from her employment on 24 February 2022 and had not been dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed.
The Tribunal also found that the respondent did not subject Ms Cairns to a detriment because she had done a protected act by bringing Employment Tribunal proceedings under the Equality Act 2010 in case number 1600273/2022. The victimisation claim therefore failed and was dismissed. The judgment was unanimous and was given orally, so no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found that the claimant resigned from her employment on 24 February 2022 and was not dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | The Tribunal found that the respondent did not subject the claimant to a detriment because she had done a protected act by bringing Employment Tribunal proceedings under the Equality Act 2010 in case number 1600273/2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.