Case 1600320/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Linthwaite v Plumtree Hotels (Dragon) Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1600320/2025
- Decision date
- 30 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd-Lawrie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Linthwaite
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Lloyd-Lawrie, sitting alone, gave judgment in the claim brought by Mr M Linthwaite against Plumtree Hotels (Dragon) Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation). The tribunal found that the Claimant succeeded in his claim for unpaid wages in the amount of £2,116.47.
The written record of the decision was approved on 25 September 2025 and sent to the parties on 30 September 2025. The document notes that written reasons will not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the record being sent, so no further reasoning is set out on the face of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment records the claim as one for unpaid wages; the Claimant succeeded in the sum of £2,116.47. No written reasons were provided with this record. | Upheld | — | £2,116 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,116
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.