Case 1600325/2017 · Employment Tribunal
In Person FOR THE v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600325/2017
- Decision date
- 3 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mrs L M Thomas, Ms J Southall
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously held that the respondent must pay the claimant £29,250.67 in compensation for discrimination pursuant to section 15 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment is confined to the compensation calculation and does not set out any additional claims or separate liability findings in the extracted text.
The award included £13,000 for injury to feelings, £4,000 for personal injury, and £4,000 for aggravated damages. The tribunal also allowed pecuniary loss of £11,101.57, made up of 39 weeks' loss of earnings at £253.32 per week, £723.30 for holiday pay loss, £98.79 for pension at 1% of lost earnings, and £400 for loss of statutory rights.
From that pecuniary subtotal, the tribunal deducted £2,850.90 in benefits received, leaving the total award at £29,250.67. No separate interest award or other monetary component is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal unanimously awarded compensation under section 15 Equality Act 2010. The judgment does not separate the award by cause of action because only this discrimination claim is recorded in the extracted text. | Upheld | Disability | £29,251 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,251
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £16,251
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.