Case 1600325/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Edge v Denbighshire County Council — 2018
- Case reference
- 1600325/2018
- Decision date
- 31 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Edge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Prestatyn before Employment Judge T Vincent Ryan, held that Mr J Edge was unfairly dismissed by Denbighshire County Council on 10 November 2017. The claim of unfair dismissal was found well-founded and succeeded.
The tribunal also found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment in relation to notice of termination. After the judgment was announced, the parties confirmed settlement of the claimant's claims arising from the two findings.
In accordance with that settlement, the respondent was to pay the claimant £5,523.29. The tribunal did not hear evidence on remedy and did not itself make a remedy award. It also recorded that the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed on 10 November 2017. The remedy was then settled together with the breach of contract claim, so no separate award was made for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment regarding notice of termination. The remedy was settled together with the unfair dismissal claim, so no separate award was made for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,523
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.