Case 1600334/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Karisa v The Governing Body of Hawarden High School HELD AT: Mold — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600334/2024
- Decision date
- 11 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
- Panel members
- Ms C Peel, Ms R Hartwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Karisa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Mold on 2 to 4 December 2024, the tribunal, constituted by Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan with lay members Ms C Peel and Ms R Hartwell, gave its judgment orally. The written record states that the Claimant’s direct sex discrimination and direct race discrimination claims were not well-founded, failed, and were dismissed.
The record does not set out a separate written reasoning section or any monetary remedy, and it notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or by written request within 14 days. On the face of the written judgment, the only recorded outcome is dismissal of both discrimination claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal held the direct sex discrimination claim was not well-founded and dismissed it unanimously. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held the direct race discrimination claim was not well-founded and dismissed it unanimously. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.