Case 1600353/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Holian v Miguel de la Rosa Luque — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600353/2019
- Decision date
- 13 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent, Employment Judge Beard proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and said there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination. The judgment therefore upheld the claimant's claims without a contested hearing.
The tribunal awarded statutory redundancy pay of £2,325.00, arrears of pay of £310.00, notice pay calculated as 12 weeks at £155.00 per week (£1,860.00), and holiday pay of £1,240.00. The total award was £5,735.00.
The judgment also recorded that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,325 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £310 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,860 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,735
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.