Case 1600357/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v The British Council and Carbon60 Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1600357/2021
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 13 January 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing, on the grounds that there was no reasonable prospect of success, that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal order dated 15 November 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant partially consented to the strike out and failed to make written representations, or failed to make any adequate representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out on those grounds, or to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim.
No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claim was struck out after the claimant was given an opportunity by letter dated 13 January 2022 to make representations or request a hearing. The stated grounds were that there was no reasonable prospect of success, there had been non-compliance with the tribunal order dated 15 November 2021, and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- non-compliance with tribunal order dated 15 November 2021
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.