Case 1600359/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Lucy Wilkins v Bryncynon Community Revival Strategy Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600359/2021
- Decision date
- 8 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Lucy Wilkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that Ms Lucy Wilkins was unfairly dismissed and wrongfully dismissed by Bryncynon Community Revival Strategy Ltd. The judgment records that the hearing took place on 21 October 2021 at Cardiff via CVP, with reasons given orally at the hearing and no written reasons provided in the written record.
The Tribunal also found that Ms Wilkins contributed to her dismissal, so the basic and compensatory award would be reduced by 50%. The written judgment does not set out the underlying findings of fact or any monetary calculation beyond that reduction.
The claims for redundancy payment and holiday pay were dismissed. No further remedy figures are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.