Case 1600359/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr C Potter (2) Mr B Lee & Others v Orthios (Anglesey) Technologies Ltd (In Administration) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600359/2022
- Decision date
- 5 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
- Venue
- By video
- Panel members
- Mr M Lewis
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr C Potter (2) Mr B Lee & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that on 30 March 2022 the First Respondent's premises at London Road, Penrhos Works, Holyhead constituted an establishment for the purpose of S188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It also found that there was no recognised trade union or appointed or elected employee representatives for the purpose of S188(1B).
The claimants' complaint that the First Respondent failed to comply with a requirement of S188 was upheld. The tribunal made a protective award in favour of the claimants and ordered the First Respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning on 31 March 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint that the First Respondent failed to comply with a requirement of S188 TULR(C)A 1992 was upheld; the tribunal made a protective award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- S188 TULR(C)A 1992
- S188(1B) TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.