Case 1600361/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L. Palmer v Shelley Norton Stage School Ltd HELD by: CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600361/2021
- Decision date
- 17 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L. Palmer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dealt only with claims the claimant withdrew at the hearing. The tribunal recorded that the Public Interest Disclosure automatic unfair dismissal claim, the Public Interest Disclosure detriment claim, the claim for statutory redundancy pay, the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, the holiday pay claim, and any TUPE claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the remaining matters. It stated that the claimant's claims for unfair redundancy dismissal, breach of contract in relation to notice, and failure to provide written employment particulars were not affected by this judgment and were to proceed to a final hearing.
Because the decision was made on the basis of withdrawal, the record contains no substantive findings on liability, no remedy assessment, and no award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Public Interest Disclosure automatic unfair dismissal ('whistleblowing' dismissal) was dismissed upon the claimant withdrawing it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Public Interest Disclosure detriment ('whistleblowing' unfavourable treatment) was dismissed upon the claimant withdrawing it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claim for entitlement to statutory redundancy pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim that the respondent failed to pay holiday pay due was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Any claims made under the TUPE Regulations were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.