Case 1600370/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Helena Madan v Calon Cardio-Technology Ltd (In Administration) — 2026
- Case reference
- 1600370/2025
- Decision date
- 8 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Helena Madan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Helena Madan's claim against Calon Cardio-Technology Ltd (In Administration). The judgment records that the Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 26 May 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 29 April 2026 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but did not reply. Employment Judge Cawthray was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that strike out was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it states only that the claim was struck out under Rule 38 because the claimant had not complied with a Tribunal order and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.