Case 1600377/2021 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600377/2021
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mrs L Bishop, Mr P Collier
Parties
1 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous tribunal, sitting at Aberystwyth on 12, 13, 14 and 16 June 2023, dismissed all claims brought by Ms M Dearden against Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited. The judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal was not made out and was dismissed.
It also records that the claim of automatic unfair dismissal was not made out and was dismissed. The extracted text does not set out further factual findings or detailed reasoning for that claim.
On the discrimination complaints, the tribunal found that the claim of discrimination arising from disability was not made out and dismissed it. It also found that the claim for breaches of the duty to make reasonable adjustments was not made out and dismissed it.
The extracted judgment does not record any monetary award or separate remedy analysis. The tribunal's decision is recorded as unanimous, and the judgment was signed by Employment Judge S Povey with Mrs L Bishop and Mr P Collier sitting as members.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim of unfair dismissal was not made out and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found the claim of automatic unfair dismissal was not made out and dismissed it; this specific category is not separately listed in the extraction taxonomy. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claim of discrimination arising from disability was not made out and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claim of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments was not made out and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.