Case 1600377/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S O'Grady v Alpha Omega Property Maintenance and Construction Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600377/2023
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S O'Grady
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 17 February 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Jenkins proceeded to determine the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 17 October 2023 was cancelled.
On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages, that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered gross payments of £287.50 for unpaid wages, £357.81 for notice damages, and £1,372.50 for unpaid holiday entitlement.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £287.50 gross under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £288 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £357.81 gross. | Upheld | — | £358 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,372.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,373 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,018
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.