Case 1600385/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Weaver v Royal Masonic Benevolent Institution Care Company Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600385/2019
- Decision date
- 2 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Weaver
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in person on 1 August 2019, Employment Judge Howden-Evans sitting alone heard evidence from Miss Weaver, submissions from both parties, and considered a bundle of 66 pages. The claimant was represented in person, supported by Mr Morgan; the respondent was represented by counsel, Ms Egan.
The tribunal decided that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim had not been presented within the time limits in the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim.
The claim was therefore dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing held on 1 August 2019 at Cardiff. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim had not been presented within the time limits in the Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.