Case 1600386/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P J Yates v Ye Olde Cross Keys Inn Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600386/2019
- Decision date
- 10 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P J Yates
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, made in the absence of an ET3 response and on the basis that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to determine the claim. Employment Judge S Davies upheld claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay and redundancy pay.
The tribunal awarded £387.59 for unpaid wages, £207.50 for holiday pay, and £250.56 for redundancy pay, making a total award of £845.65. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The hearing listed for 11 June 2019 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as unpaid wages and awards £387.59. | Upheld | — | £388 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment awards £207.50 for holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £208 |
| Redundancy | The judgment awards £250.56 for redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £251 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £846
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.