Case 1600388/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. G Jones v OEAJ Limited and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600388/2021
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr. G Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 26 August 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims against the second and fourth Respondents, Claire Nicholls, should not be struck out. The stated reason was that there was no jurisdiction to bring claims against anyone other than the employer.
The claimant did not make sufficient representations and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Sharp therefore struck out the claims against the second and fourth Respondents in the judgment dated 11 January 2022, sent to the parties on 21 January 2022. The judgment does not record any substantive merits decision or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. It records only that the claims against the second and fourth Respondents, Claire Nicholls, were struck out for want of jurisdiction to bring claims against anyone other than the employer. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.