Case 1600388/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Davies & Others v Capita Business Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600388/2022
- Decision date
- 14 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Hunt Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Davies & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant had complied with the ACAS early conciliation provisions under s.18A Employment Rights Act 1996, that the claim was in time under s.23 ERA 1996, and that the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear it.
The claim for unlawful deduction of wages was found to be well founded. The tribunal held that an unlawful deduction was made when the 2020 pay award and back pay due on 30 November 2020 were implemented, and that the deduction was ongoing.
The tribunal did not determine the amount of the award in this judgment. It directed that repayment of the deduction up to and including 23 January 2023, and any attributable financial losses, would be determined later unless the parties reached agreement on the outstanding overtime issue by 21 February 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the unlawful deduction of wages claim well founded. The amount of repayment and any financial losses were left to be determined, with a remedy hearing to be listed unless the parties reached agreement on overtime. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.18A Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.