Case 1600393/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Harris v Croeso Staff Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600393/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Brace on 6 July 2020 and sent to the parties on 7 July 2020. The tribunal found that Croeso Staff Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss L Harris's wages.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross/net sum of £383.09. The judgment text also records that the case remained to be listed for hearing against the first respondent at a date to be confirmed, but no further substantive findings are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £383.09 gross/net. | Upheld | — | £383 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £383
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.