Case 1600394/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Underwood v Joseph Pasha — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600394/2023
- Decision date
- 28 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Dat
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Underwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered Miss C Underwood's unfair dismissal complaint against Joseph Pasha. It found that she had been employed for less than two years, and therefore was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant had failed to make written representations, or sufficient written representations, as to why the claim should not be struck out, and had not requested a hearing. For that reason, the claim was struck out. The hearing listed for 18 August 2023 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required two years' service for an unfair dismissal complaint. It found the claimant had less than two years' service and did not make sufficient written representations, or request a hearing, against strike out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.