Case 1600397/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G James v Cosmic Lifestyle UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600397/2023
- Decision date
- 11 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy email dated 18 August 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-attendance, failure to comply with directions, and failure to actively pursue the case. The claimant did not make written representations addressing those points.
On that basis, Employment Judge Jenkins ordered that the claim be struck out. The extracted text records no substantive determination of the merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim labels. The tribunal struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant did not make written representations in response to an email dated 18 August 2023 that gave him an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for non-attendance, failure to comply with directions, and failure to actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.