Case 1600401/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Keir Phillips v FPV Group Limited t/a FPV Worldwide — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600401/2022
- Decision date
- 18 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bromige Representation
- Venue
- Wales ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Keir Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not attend. Employment Judge J Bromige found that FPV Group Limited t/a FPV Worldwide made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant any wages between 19 October 2021 and 19 January 2022.
The tribunal recorded that the relevant period was 13 weeks. The claimant was contracted to work 30 hours per week at £8.91 per hour gross, giving 390 hours unpaid. On that basis, the tribunal calculated the sum due as £3,474.90 and ordered the respondent to pay that amount gross, with the claimant responsible for any tax or employee national insurance that might become due.
The tribunal recorded that the total award was £3,474.90 and that the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent unlawfully deducted wages by failing to pay any wages between 19 October 2021 and 19 January 2022. The award was made gross. | Upheld | — | £3,475 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,475
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.