Case 1600408/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Allison Skhane v Dr S Mummidi and Dr H Weaver t/a Fairfield Surgery — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600408/2021
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff and CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Allison Skhane
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 1 April 2022 before Employment Judge R Brace, the tribunal dealt with a claim arising under Regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant a sum in lieu of 6 days' holiday that she had accrued but not taken by the date her employment ended.
The tribunal therefore upheld the claim and ordered the respondent to pay £405. It also recorded that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons were provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal rules.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that, in breach of Regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the respondent had failed to pay the claimant a sum in lieu of 6 days' accrued but untaken holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £405 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £405
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.