Case 1600410/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Mallett v Central FM Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600410/2022
- Decision date
- 20 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Mallett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment records that Ms M Mallett’s claims against Central FM Group Limited were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The tribunal did not make any substantive findings on liability or remedy against this respondent in this decision.
The judgment also states that the claimant’s claims against the other respondent, Central Recruitment Solutions Limited, would proceed to a hearing listed to start on 17 April 2023. No legal test or award is identified in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant; no merits findings recorded against this respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant; no merits findings recorded against this respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant; no merits findings recorded against this respondent. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant; no merits findings recorded against this respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.