Case 1600416/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Pawsey v Mr R Sage and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600416/2022
- Decision date
- 23 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Pawsey
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 19 August 2022 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, the tribunal recorded that the claims against the First Respondent, Mr R Sage, were withdrawn against him personally, without prejudice to the claims against the Second Respondent, S.T.A.R Domiciliary Care Ltd. Mr Sage was dismissed as a party to those claims.
The judgment also records that the claimant withdrew his claim for unpaid holiday pay. That claim was dismissed. No findings were made on the substantive merits of any of the pleaded claims in this short judgment.
Written reasons were not provided because the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and no request for reasons was made within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claims against the First Respondent were withdrawn against him personally, without prejudice to the claims against the Second Respondent, and he was dismissed as a party to these claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant withdrew his claim for unpaid holiday pay, and it was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.