Case 1600418/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Davies v Aldi — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600418/2024
- Decision date
- 7 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Representation
- Venue
- Port Talbot Justice Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Port Talbot Justice Centre on 4 June 2024, Employment Judge R Harfield heard Mr G Davies's application for interim relief against Aldi. The written judgment records that the application was unsuccessful because it did not appear to the tribunal that it was likely that, when determining the complaint, it would find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was that the claimant had made a protected disclosure or disclosures.
The judgment also states that the claimant's unfair dismissal / "automatic" unfair dismissal claim continues and will be listed for a case management preliminary hearing after the respondent files its ET3 Grounds of Resistance. No monetary award was made and the merits of the underlying claim were not determined in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief in a protected disclosure / automatic unfair dismissal case. The tribunal refused the application and recorded that the underlying unfair dismissal/"automatic" unfair dismissal claim continues. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.