Case 1600419/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Roberts v Art of Eco Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600419/2024
- Decision date
- 6 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Mark Roberts brought a complaint against Art of Eco Limited that was recorded in the judgment as a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. At the hearing in Cardiff by video on 25 October 2024, Employment Judge S Jenkins heard the matter with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by a litigation consultant.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. The written judgment states that the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,407.38 in respect of that complaint.
The decision was given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the published record. The extract therefore records the outcome and the amount awarded, but does not set out any further factual findings or legal reasoning beyond the successful unauthorised deductions from wages claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the successful complaint as a claim of unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,407.38. | Upheld | — | £1,407 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,407
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.