Case 1600429/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Evans v Little Bambinos Nursery Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600429/2023
- Decision date
- 24 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss H Evans against Little Bambinos Nursery Ltd. The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded because the respondent had made deductions from wages in the period 1 December 2022 to 31 January 2023.
The tribunal also found that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when her employment ended.
The respondent was ordered to pay £1,696.90, described as the gross sum deducted for the wages claim, and £456.00 for the holiday pay claim. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on those sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 December 2022 to 31 January 2023 and ordered the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,697 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction based on failure to pay holiday accrued but not taken when employment ended and ordered £456.00. | Upheld | — | £456 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,153
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.