Case 1600434/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Harris v Elegant Park Homes (in compulsory liquidation) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600434/2023
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Harris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cardiff on 20 July 2023, Employment Judge C Sharp sat alone. The claimant appeared in person. The respondents were debarred and did not attend. The tribunal found that Elegant Park Homes Ltd was the claimant's employer.
The tribunal dismissed the claims against Mr R Akhtar. It said that, in any event, it did not have jurisdiction to consider a claim against him because no ACAS early conciliation naming him had been obtained.
The claimant's claim for accrued unpaid annual leave, which the tribunal also treated as an unauthorised deduction from wages claim, was found to be well founded. Elegant Park Homes Ltd was ordered to pay £826.50 gross to the claimant, who was made responsible for any tax or national insurance contributions due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for accrued unpaid annual leave well founded and treated it as an unauthorised deduction from wages claim. The award was made against the First Respondent. The claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed because no ACAS early conciliation naming him had been obtained, and the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider a claim against him. | Upheld | — | £827 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £827
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.