Case 1600437/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Cordle v Signature Living (first respondent), Lawrence Kenwright (second respondent) & Steve O’Hara (third respondent) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600437/2018
- Decision date
- 20 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Members
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mr A Fryer, Mr M Pearson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Cordle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Cardiff on 14 October 2019 before Employment Judge R Harfield, with lay members Mr A Fryer and Mr M Pearson. The judgment records representation for both sides but gives no substantive findings on the merits of the case.
The only operative decision stated in the extracted text is that the claim against Signature Living, Lawrence Kenwright and Steve O’Hara was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it. No liability findings, remedy assessment, or apportionment between respondents are recorded in the judgment extract provided.
The judgment was dated 17 October 2019 and sent to the parties on 20 October 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded cause(s) of action in the extracted text; it records only that the claim against all respondents was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.