Case 1600438/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Stanton v The Parade (Neath) Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600438/2023
- Decision date
- 19 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe parties agreed that the Claimant’s employer at the effective date of termination was the First Respondent. On that basis, the claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed as not well founded.
The Claimant’s claim for unpaid accrued annual leave, also pleaded as a wages claim, was found well founded. The tribunal recorded that no further payment would be made because the First Respondent had recently paid and the parties agreed there would be no further payment, and the ACAS uplift sought in relation to that claim was refused.
The separate claim for financial loss arising from the failure to pay annual leave was withdrawn and dismissed. The claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars succeeded, and the First Respondent was ordered to pay two weeks’ gross pay totalling £756.00.
The Claimant’s claim under s10 Employment Relations Act 1999 was dismissed, and the application for a financial penalty payable to the Secretary of State was withdrawn and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid accrued annual leave, also asserted to be a wages claim; the tribunal found it well founded but recorded that no further payment would be made because the First Respondent had recently paid and the parties agreed that no further payment was due. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Claim for financial loss arising from the failure to pay annual leave; withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars; the tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay two weeks' gross pay, totaling £756.00. | Upheld | — | £756 |
| Other | Claim under s10 Employment Relations Act 1999; not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £756
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.