Case 1600439/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jacek Dobija v TLSC London Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600439/2019
- Decision date
- 16 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jacek Dobija
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Beard dealt with the case on 16 July 2019 under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because no ET3 response form had been received from the respondent. The judgment records that there was sufficient material before the judge to determine the matter in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice pay. The sums awarded were £9,413.16 for unpaid wages, £1,094.20 for holiday pay and £9,355.92 for notice pay, making a total award of £19,863.28.
The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. No separate injury to feelings, interest, or other additional remedy is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the unpaid wages claim under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response. | Upheld | — | £9,413 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the holiday pay claim under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response. | Upheld | — | £1,094 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the notice pay claim under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response. | Upheld | — | £9,356 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,863
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.