Case 1600440/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Edwards v Tiffin Sandwiches Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600440/2023
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with an unfair dismissal complaint brought by Mr B Edwards against Tiffin Sandwiches Ltd. By a letter dated 12 October 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the complaint should not be struck out.
In its reasons, Employment Judge Jenkins recorded that the claimant had complied with the tribunal's order dated 15 September 2023, but that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing to oppose strike out.
The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim. It also recorded that the hearing listed for 27 November 2023 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 12 October 2023 to make representations or request a hearing. It recorded that the claim had complied with the order dated 15 September 2023 but had not been actively pursued, and that the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.