Case 1600441/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr S Williams v Green Willow Funerals Limited — 2018

Case reference: 1600441/2018
Decision date: 1 December 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Sharp Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S Williams

Respondent

Green Willow Funerals Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 29 November 2018, Employment Judge Sharp Date issued a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The claimant had withdrawn the redundancy claim and the claim for dismissal connected to health and safety, and the tribunal dismissed both claims following that withdrawal. No merits findings were made on those claims in this judgment.

The tribunal also dismissed the respondent's contract claim on the ground that there was no jurisdiction for it to be heard by the employment tribunal. The order records that the remaining claims would proceed to a hearing in due course. No monetary award was made in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	The tribunal said this claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Claim described as dismissal connected to health and safety; the tribunal said it was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Breach of contract	The respondent's contract claim was dismissed because the tribunal said there was no jurisdiction for it to be heard.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.