Case 1600443/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Dodd v DRB Group Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600443/2023
- Decision date
- 6 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Dodd
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the complaints of Redundancy Payment, Unpaid Wages and Unpaid Holiday Pay. It recorded that the claimant had been given an opportunity by letter dated 29 September 2023 to make representations or request a hearing on why those complaints should not be struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out those complaints. The judgment also stated that the judgment in the claimant's favour in relation to his protective award claims remained unaffected.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The complaint of Redundancy Payment was struck out because the claimant did not make representations, sufficient representations, or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to do so. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a complaint of Unpaid Wages and strikes it out on the same basis as the other complaints. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of Unpaid Holiday Pay was struck out on the same basis as the other complaints. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.