Case 1600447/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Adekoya v Cheerful Elegant Healthcare Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600447/2019
- Decision date
- 6 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mr M Pearson, Mr M Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Adekoya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs K Adekoya brought a claim against Cheerful Elegant Healthcare Ltd for direct discrimination because of pregnancy and maternity. The case was heard at Cardiff on 4 and 5 February 2020 before Employment Judge Moore, with Mr M Pearson and Mr M Lewis as members.
The written judgment records only the tribunal's conclusion that the claimant's claim did not succeed and was dismissed. It does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or reasoning because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No monetary remedy is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states this was a claim for direct discrimination because of pregnancy and maternity. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons or monetary award are set out in the written record. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.