Case 1600447/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Miller v PSL2021 Realisations Ltd (in administration) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600447/2021
- Decision date
- 3 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr C Miller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claim against the First Respondent for an unpaid statutory redundancy payment. It found that section 145 of the Employment Rights Act meant the relevant date for the claimant's qualifying service was 11 December 2020, so the claimant had two years' qualifying service.
The tribunal awarded £494.15, representing the difference between the claimant's statutory redundancy entitlement of £711.18 and the £217.03 already received as part payment. The claimant's remaining complaints of unfair dismissal, notice pay and a protective award remained stayed because consent had not been provided for those claims to continue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment upheld the claim against the First Respondent for an unpaid statutory redundancy payment. The remaining complaints of unfair dismissal, notice pay and a protective award were stayed and were not adjudicated in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £494 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £494
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 145 of the Employment Rights Act
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.