Case 1600448/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J. Roberts v Your Car Parts Ltd HELD by: CVP & telephone — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600448/2021
- Decision date
- 2 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J. Roberts
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr J. Roberts was unfairly dismissed by Your Car Parts Ltd on 25 February 2021. The respondent had not presented a response to the claim, and the tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and considered the available material before deciding that the unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeded.
The judgment did not determine remedy at the same hearing. The tribunal noted that the Notice of Hearing had indicated that any remedy consideration would be at a subsequent hearing, and that the respondent appeared to wish to make representations on remedy. It therefore directed that any award consequent on the liability judgment would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
The tribunal also recorded that participation by the respondent at the Remedy Hearing would be subject to Rule 21(3) and to compliance with case management orders and conduct consistent with the overriding objective. It noted that Mr Staples did not assist the tribunal or co-operate with it or the claimant in ensuring that the claim and hearing were dealt with fairly and justly under Rule 2.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.