Case 1600452/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Yat San Shu [1] Miss Cheuk Yau Tsang [2] Miss Pui Yu Shu [3] v GD Box Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600452/2021
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Randall Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Yat San Shu [1] Miss Cheuk Yau Tsang [2] Miss Pui Yu Shu [3]
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claims at Cardiff on 30 May 2022 before Employment Judge Randall. It recorded that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons were provided unless requested under the tribunal rules.
It found that the respondent had made deductions from each claimant's wages without authorisation, contrary to section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. For the first claimant, the deduction covered wages for 1 to 15 November 2020 and the tribunal ordered payment of £1,009.84. For the second claimant, the deduction also covered 1 to 15 November 2020 and the tribunal ordered payment of £922.95.
For the third claimant, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for 1 to 13 November 2020 and ordered payment of £861.64. The written judgment also states that the claimants are responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 15 November 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,010 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 15 November 2020. | Upheld | — | £923 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Third claimant. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 13 November 2020. | Upheld | — | £862 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,794
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.