Case 1600453/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Michael v David Walter Phillips & Ieuan Jones Formerly Trading as Jestyn Jeffreys — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600453/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Michael
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent confirmed it did not resist the claimant’s claims. Employment Judge R Harfield said there was sufficient material to enable a proper determination, and proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld four monetary claims. It awarded unpaid wages of £93.96 gross, unpaid holiday pay of £187.92 gross, breach of contract in respect of unpaid notice pay of £250.62 gross, and statutory redundancy pay of £1,879.20. The judgment does not contain disputed factual findings on liability beyond the respondent’s non-resistance and the tribunal’s decision to determine the claims on the material before it.
The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages, unpaid holiday pay and unpaid notice pay. The total of the awards set out in the judgment is £2,411.70.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records an award for unpaid wages (gross) of £93.96. | Upheld | — | £94 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records an award for unpaid holiday pay (gross) of £187.92. | Upheld | — | £188 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records an award for breach of contract, described as unpaid notice pay (gross), of £250.62. | Upheld | — | £251 |
| Redundancy | The judgment records an award for statutory redundancy pay of £1,879.20. | Upheld | — | £1,879 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,412
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.