Case 1600459/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mcmillan v Gin Ne Sais Quoi (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600459/2023
- Decision date
- 24 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Mcmillan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 5 March 2023. The respondent, Gin Ne Sais Quoi (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation), failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Sharp decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr J Mcmillan £551.25. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and employee national insurance contributions. The judgment was sent to the parties on 24 August 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £551 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £551
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.