Case 1600465/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms R Halliwell (2) Ms M Rowlands v Gekko UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600465/2018
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R.F. Powell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ms R Halliwell (2) Ms M Rowlands
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Llandudno before Employment Judge R.F. Powell, recorded that the First Claimant, Ms R Halliwell, was unfairly dismissed and wrongfully dismissed. It also recorded that the Second Claimant, Ms M Rowlands, was unfairly dismissed and wrongfully dismissed.
The judgment further states that the Claimants’ claims for unlawful deductions from wages, said to concern the Respondent’s alleged failure to pay accrued holiday pay, were dismissed upon withdrawal. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract.
The extracted text does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasons for the findings, but it clearly records the final outcomes on each pleaded claim and the withdrawal of the wages claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | First claimant, Ms R Halliwell, was found to have been unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | First claimant, Ms R Halliwell, was found to have been wrongfully dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Second claimant, Ms M Rowlands, was found to have been unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Second claimant, Ms M Rowlands, was found to have been wrongfully dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claims for unlawful deductions from wages, said to arise from alleged failure to pay accrued holiday pay, were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.