Case 1600471/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Gake v Celsa Steel (uk) Limited & Others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600471/2020
- Decision date
- 26 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Gake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike out judgment in the case of Mrs M Gake v Celsa Steel (UK) Limited & Others. By letter dated 15 April 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment is signed by Employment Judge Moore and the decision was sent to the parties on 26 June 2020, following the judgment date of 29 May 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying cause of action. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.