Case 1600476/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Steven Hart v Salem Construction Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600476/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bromige Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Steven Hart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the Claimant's claim for wrongful dismissal, presented as a claim for notice pay, succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay £446.25 gross.
The award was calculated by reference to the Claimant's entitlement to one week's notice pay. The tribunal recorded that the Claimant worked on average 42.5 hours per week at a rate of £10.50 per hour.
The tribunal stated that the sum was calculated gross of income tax and employee national insurance contributions, and that the Claimant was responsible for any tax or employee national insurance contributions that may become due. It also recorded that the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim succeeded as a claim for wrongful dismissal (notice pay). The tribunal awarded £446.25 gross, calculated on the basis of one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £446 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £446
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £446
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.